Here are the screenshots for the conflicting settings. If someone can test this go post your result in the comments or in the poll, it would be highly appreciated and would help the community and possibly the developers will notice it.
If yes then i'm not sure why do they have different configurations. I don't know if these two companies are still related to each other particularly in this, but I know that the old Razer Game booster before it was integrated into Razer cortex which is now System Booster was or based from IObit's own game booster. So that's why i am posting here If someone has the same result as me or is it just me that encounters this kind of problem. Surprisingly IObit Advanced SystemCare made my system more responsive and boot up faster as opposed to Razer which does the opposite.
I tried to apply both optimizations to my system to see the results. They point out exact same settings which in my case were 3 (see screenshots for the setting names). (Applying the optimization on Razer will make IObit optimization status as "unoptimized" vice versa) Cons: Some of the features need to be downloaded separately. Enhances the web browsing speed This version has many extra features. It has a health monitor that provides all system information. Okay, so I just found that there are conflicting optimizations between these two softwares. It is a low-cost software and a free version is also available. Advanced SystemCare Free, Pro and Ultimate are three programs for the Windows operating system designed to manage, optimize and protect PCs. DISCLAIMER: I am just conducting an investigation and I have no intention of promoting IObit software here.
0 kommentar(er)
